The main points of the article are reviewing the use of Photoshop as a good or bad way. It also brings the idea of what is real and what isn’t . The article stresses the fact that with our digital technology we can manipulate photos easily. Photoshop is used so often past the boundaries of what is ethically right, people question, when is to much? And when will it come to an end? If it ever does.
Do you agree you agree with the general push and overall ideas of the article?
I do agree that there should be some limitations. With new digital techniques bodies that outstretch the limits of what is humanly normal are created. This is prominent in magazines and adds. I feel that these acts create a negative self image for the viewers. I agree with those who say that it adds to the way women are being visually defined. In our society, we are pressured to fit into a certain norm. The fact of the matter is that those who are photographed or in movies. Don’t even look like that. It is important that we, the viewers of the media, develop a strong resistance against being pressured into thinking we have to look perfect. We have to make sure that Photoshop and these adds and media don’t create a false reality in our minds.
When should Photoshop be/not be used to alter a photograph?
I think that Photoshop should be used to enhance a picture, not completely alter it. I see no problem in using the technology to clear up blemishes to make a photo look more profession. What I do think is wrong is taking of inches from the waist, making muscles look better and real. This use of alteration, not only creates a false self image, but it is ethically wrong and effects the society on a higher level. Photoshop is okay to fix technical errors such as blur or unwanted objects, but there is a fine line that is crossed to often.